Reference · stays inside this course
Appendix G — Current-events Evidence Pack
Academy reading copy. This lesson is not offered as a file download.
Appendix G — Current-events Evidence Pack Purpose Keep volatile facts out of the durable curriculum. Update this pack before each cohort and whenever a major event changes the information environment. Archive superseded versions; never overwrite history silently.
Pack control FIELD ENTRY Cohort / location / languages Pack version Cutoff date/time/timezone Lead verifier / reviewer Legal/security/localization reviewer Published correction channel Next scheduled review Required sections SECTION MINIMUM CONTENT QUALITY TEST Definitions Current links to IHRA, JDA, Nexus; local legal/policy definitions identified separately. Original text, version/date, no claim that one framework is universal law. Incident data Newest relevant police/government, community-monitor, and survey evidence.
Method, place, period, units, denominator where available, underreporting/cross-country caveats. Current cases 2–4 verified local or global cases relevant to the cohort. Facts separated from allegations, law, analysis, and opinion; trauma-safe presentation. Reporting routes Emergency, non-emergency, institution, platform, civil rights, safeguarding, cyber. Tested links/numbers; jurisdiction and language/access notes. Policy/law Relevant anti-discrimination, hate-crime, education/workplace, privacy, protest, and speech rules.
Reviewed by qualified local source; educational summary not legal advice. Threat/calendar Public events, anniversaries, elections, holidays, conflicts, or platform trends requiring review. Scenario language, not prediction; protective indicators and thresholds included. Partners Trusted Jewish, interfaith, civic, government, first-responder, legal, cyber, wellbeing contacts. Consent, named roles, last verified date, no public private contacts. Corrections What changed, old claim, corrected claim, evidence, date, audience reached.
Same or greater visibility for material corrections.
Source annotation card FIELD ENTRY Smallest testable claim Claim label Verified / Supported / Disputed / Unverified / False–Misleading / Opinion Primary/original source / URL FIELD ENTRY Publisher / author / institutional role Publication and event date / timezone Jurisdiction / population / unit Method / sample / definition Independent corroboration Contradiction / alternative explanation Known limitations / uncertainty Safe-to-share excerpt or summary Amplification / privacy / trauma risk Reviewer / retrieval date Framework comparison worksheet CASE TEXT / CONDUCT IHRA TEXT JDA TEXT NEXUS TEXT LOCAL LAW / POLICY REJEWENATE ASSESSMENT Publication gate
The headline leads with truth, not the harmful claim. ☐
Date, place, source, and status are visible. ☐
Original context was checked; a social post is not treated as primary proof. ☐
Uncertainty and credible disagreement are stated. ☐
No private address, child, victim image, graphic content, vulnerability, or unnecessary identifier ☐ is exposed.
Translation was reviewed by a fluent human for meaning and cultural context. ☐
Affected people’s consent and wishes were honored. ☐
The response level and spokesperson authority are correct. ☐
Accessibility includes captions, alt text, readable contrast, and plain-language summary. ☐
Correction owner and review time are assigned. ☐ Source trail: IHRA Working Definition
Jerusalem Declaration
Nexus Document
ADL 2025 Audit
FRA third survey
UNESCO misinformation unit